To kommunikation@domstolsstyrelsen.dk
Sent 2021.10.29
BS-37726/2021-KBH
Frist for betaling af retsafgift DKK 1500 synes udsat på trods af at sagen var lovet lukket og slettet med udgangen af torsdag 2021.11.28.
Retten har ikke taget stilling til og besvaret de emails jeg har sendt hvori der er spørgsmål der drejer sig om sagen og dens lovlighed. Retten har dog lovet at besvare om 1-3 dage regnet fra igår.
Derfor: jeg kan idag 2021.11.29 evt. betale retsafgift DKK 1500 for gruppesøgsmålet men jeg vil og skal derfor meddele, at evt. betaling af retsafgift DKK 1500 gøres i protest og at betaling ikke er en anerkendelse af domstolen da domstolen er stævnet i gruppesøgsmålet. Det er imod principielle retsprincipper, at sagsøger ikke skal betale til sagsøgte og at sagsøgte ikke skal tage stilling til sagsøgtes juridiske ulovligheder nævnt i sagen via stævningen - altså at sagsøgte ikke skal være sagsbehandler og dommer i en sag anlagt mod sig selv nemlig Danmarks Domstole.
Derfor har jeg 2021.10.03, via oprettelsen af sagen denne dato, anlagt det sysnspunkt, at retsafgift skal være DKK nul. Kbhs Byret, Danmark Domstole, har muligvis besluttet at afvente betaling af retsafgift eller udsat betaling og som meddelt vil besvare de af mig stillede spørgsmål i email sendt bla. igår 2021.10.28. Efter besvarelse antages det, at jeg så med svarene kan tage stilling til betaling af retsafgift eller ej og tage stilling til sagens videre forløb.
Derfor betaler jeg ikke retsafgift, da der strider imod retsikkerheden, og jeg foretager mig ikke noget i sagen før jeg har modtaget svar. Betaling af retsafgift vil ikke forekomme under den nuværende situation. Sættedommer kommer ej heller på tale.
Hvis Danmarks Domstole vælger at lukke sagen, så er alle instanser i Danmark prøvet for at opretholde at afprøve nationale domstole ved krænkelser jvf. EU Fundamentale Rettigheder.
Niels Ulrik Reinwald
English translated by Google Translate:
BS-37726/2021-KBH
Deadline for payment of court fee DKK 1500 seems postponed despite the fact that the case was promised closed and closed with the end of Thursday 2021.11.28.
The court has not ruled on and answered the emails I have sent in which there are questions about the case and its legality. However, the court has promised to answer in 1-3 days from yesterday.
Therefore: I can today 2021.11.29 possibly. pay court fee DKK 1500 for the class action but I will and must therefore announce that any. payment of court fee DKK 1500 is made in protest and that payment is not a recognition of the court as the court has been sued in the class action. It is against principled legal principles that the plaintiff should not pay to the defendant and that the defendant should not take a position on the defendant's legal illegalities mentioned in the case via the summons - that is, that the defendant should not be a caseworker and judge in a case brought against him.
Therefore, 2021.10.03, via the creation of the case this date, I have taken the view that court fee should be DKK zero. Kbhs Byret, Denmark Courts, may have decided to wait for payment of court fees or deferred payment and as notified will answer the questions I asked in the email sent, among other things. yesterday 2021.10.28. After answering, it is assumed that I can then with the answers decide on the payment of court fees or not and decide on the further course of the case.
Therefore, I do not pay court fees as it is contrary to legal certainty and I do not take any action in the case until I have received a reply. Payment of court fees will not occur under the current situation. Settlement judgments are also out of the question.
If the Danish Courts choose to close the case, then all instances in Denmark have been tried to continue to try national courts for violations, cf. EU Fundamental Rights.
Niels Ulrik Reinwald