Class Action Lawsuit against Terror State Of Denmark
Principal case as subclass-cases joined. empirically proving statE-terror and state-destruction by the state itself.

NEWS

2021.10.27: Danmarks Domstole may shut the case down because NUR will not pay the court-fee. Paying to the defendant a fee to let the defendant find if the defendant if guilty is like washing your washing-machine with your washing-machine.

2021.10.14 Adding information and building site. Will most likely start loading some of the first cases in the beginning of November 2021.

 

Impartial tribunial

Updated: Monday, October 11, 2021 9:24 AM
Created: Tuesday, October 5, 2021

Judicial independence, Subsistence and the conclusion that Danmarks Domstole is proven voided and an unlawfull and illegal entity.

Note by NUR: how the court can decide whether conditions are met is unbeknown since the court is defined as a place where a judged is present. The clerks seem to handle the conditions. If clerk handles this part of the procedure taking 3 weeks and the case is said to not meet the conditions, then this is a failure on Danmarks Domstole to fullfill Fundamental Rights in Europe:

Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.
Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.
Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

Source: https://fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/article/47-right-effective-remedy-and-fair-trial.

Impartial tribunal: Danmarks Domstole is paid for by The Ministry of Finance, Finansministeriet, https://fm.dk which gets its money from the State which collects money via taxes from people and corporations.

It is yet by request from Niels Ulrik Reinwald to The Ministry of Finance and others, how much and from where Danmarks Domstole is paid. NUR has emailed The Ministry of Finance asking for budget and total cost fiscal year 2020. This email as a request has been sent 2021 October 5 and there is no reply yet. NUR also telephoned The Ministry of Finance and NUR was put on hold and then to an answering machine and NUR spoke a message yet no reply. The Ministry of Finance simply does not know or keeps the information undisclosed. Found partly via The Minsitry of Finance's website leading to each law of each fiscal years:

Finansministeriets Økonomisk Administrative Vejledning in https://domstol.dk/media/2z1fbq3g/danmarks-domstoles-aarsrapport-for-2020.pdf found here hints at the source of income to Danmarks Domstole.

Page 7:

The ordinary operating expenses incl. Revenue-recognized appropriations amount to DKK 2,056.4 million. The salaries amounts to DKK 1,313.7 million. DKK, which is an increase of approx. 17 mio. from 2019 to 2020, corresponding to an increase of 1.3 per cent.

[..]

Other costs amount to DKK 671.4 million. DKK, of which rent, property taxes, energy and others property-related expenses amount to approx. 378.5 million Compared with 2019, there has been an increase in other costs of approx. 30 million kr., which i.a. due to a continuing great need for maintenance of the courts' IT systems.

Ministry of Finance Finance Act for financial year 2020

https://fm.dk/udgivelser/2020/februar/finansloven-for-2020/

PDF for fiscal year 2020: https://fm.dk/media/17675/fl20a11.pdf

Page 71

Expenses 2020 1.809,9 million DKK, salary, rent, heating, etc.

Income 2020 5.6 million DKK fees only.

Income is paid for via fees which are taxed with V.A.T. at 25% and expenses are paid via taxation paid by people and corporations.

Fee for filing a Class Action and subpoena

A fee is a tax and taxing people for filing a court case is not allowed by law.

DEN STORE DANSKE (Danish Dictionary)

Afgift: "skat der skal betales ved produktion, import eller omsætning af en vare eller ydelse, og som staten opkræver for at skaffe økonomiske midler til det offentlige eller for at modvirke overforbrug eller miljøskadelig virksomhed"

So the user pays a fee to dispose of waste and this fee, which is a tax, is burned yet again with V.A.T. which in Denmark is called Moms (which in English means mothers) and Internal Revenue (skat.dk) calls this Moms a Merværdiafgift; meaning; Morevaluefee which nicely leads to value added tax abbreviated V.A.T. which then begs the question why not call it V.A.T. because skat in Danish means darling and that is why it has many names. Here comes the magic: customer pays a fee, which is a tax, which is no less than value added tax, to rid the waste, and on top of that fee the customer pays yet again 25% Moms which is V.A.T. which then means, mathematically and all, that the customer pay V.A.T. on V.A.T. on something which has value added and this added value is waste, which then in natural terms leads to the equation called gravity; that the customer by paying V.A.T. to rid the waste adds value which explains why the holder of waste has a bargaining-value and should logically be able to negotiate the price of the value which is added to the waste which also explains why waste is a product just like any other commodity like sugar, coffee, metals, soybeans, palmoil etc.

Therefore; fee is tax.

European Justice on fees

"Litigation costs in civil and commercial matters are governed by national legislation and costs are not harmonised at EU level. Thus, costs vary from one Member State to another."

Source: https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_costs_of_proceedings-37-en.do.

Cost for Denmark is show at same website: https://e-justice.europa.eu/37/EN/costs?DENMARK&member=1

Danmarks Domstol on court-fee (Retsafgift): https://domstol.dk/alle-emner/sagsomkostninger/retsafgift/

Law on court-fees (Lov om retsafgifter LOV nr 425 af 16/03/2021): https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2021/425. Nowhere in this law is mentioned that people or anyone shall pay a tax which a fee (afgift).

Fee τέλη téli has 2 Occurrences in The Bible as the foundation of The State of Denmark.

τέλη translated as:

  1. customs
  2. ends, the end, to the end

Judicial independence

https://www.britannica.com/topic/judicial-independence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_6_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights

Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/guide_art_6_criminal_eng.pdf (livelihood not mentioned)

Independent

Dictionary Definition for Independent via google.com:

  1. free from outside control; not subject to another's authority."an independent nuclear deterrent".
  2. not depending on another for livelihood or subsistence."I wanted to remain independent in old age"

Subsistence

Dictionary Definition for Subsistence via google.com:

  1. the action or fact of maintaining or supporting oneself, especially at a minimal level."the minimum income needed for subsistence"

Impartial

Dictionary Definition for Independent via google.com:

  1. treating all rivals or disputants equally.

Full list of conventions

https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d

Article 6

Right to a fair trial 1

In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

Conclusions

The list is not exhaustive.

Independent: It has therefore been proven, that Danmarks Domstole is paid for by Ministry of Finance and is thus not independent defined as among others via subsistence; the action or fact of maintaining or supporting oneself. Since taxpayers pay most of all of the expenses to Danmarks Domstole, independence is therefor voided.

Impartial: The red paint thrower received 4 month imprisonment while Anders Fogh Rasmussen question if International Criminal Court will prosecute a Prime Minister. Danmarks Domstole aware of the situation related to war in Iraq instituted by State of Denmark with other nations. 150.000 people died violently in the Iraq war 2003-2006. The 2003 invasion of Iraq where NATO was involved and later Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen be came NATO secretary general. Anders Fogh Rasmussen was Prime Minister from November 2001 to April 2009 and the Iraq war was started with State of Denmark 2003 while Anders Fogh Rasmussen was Prime Minister hence he feared ICC could prosecute him. Since ICC and Danmarks Domstole imprisons someone for throwing paint and does nothing to a man "with blood on his hands" impartiality is voided.

Danmarks Domstole does not uphold neither humans rights and Fundamental Rights in Europe and Saddam Hussein was hunted down like worse than a dead rat and hanged without a fair trial at ICC. State of Denmark has signed EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Article 2 - Right to life

1. Everyone has the right to life
2. No one shall be condemned to the death penalty, or executed.

Youtube.com Iraq and Saddam Hussein

All condoned, supported and accepted by the State of Denmark.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is said to permits the use of the death penalty in limited circumstances.

ICC tries cases such as genocide and crimes against humanity and not a local Iraq court named Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal.

Since International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is said to allow death penalty then Fundamental Rights Europe are voided and obsolete making International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights obsolete and voided too because that charter goes against Fundamental Rights Europe. It is a bewildering and unlawful. You as a citizens of Europe or Planet Earth can receive the death penalty and this may explain why nations such as Denmark goes to war without avoiding deaths galore and death penalty by a mock court outside of ICC which Anders Fogh Rasmussen himself asked to avoid because killing via genocide seems to go one way only and this explain why a paint-throwers receive prison-time while genocide and unlawful penalty by hanging goes unpunished since using hanging and filming it goes against any type of humanity known to humanity.